Monday, April 4

EAW5 Interview Preparation _WLI Student Assessment Pack Template

 

Student Assessment Pack

Ensure this cover sheet is attached to your work.

 

Student and Trainer/Assessor Details

Student ID

 

Student name

 

 

Contact number

 

Email address

 

Trainer/Assessor name

 

 

Course and Unit Details

Course name

Professional Year Program – EAW5

Unit code and name

Interview Preparation

Due Date

 

Submission Date

 

 

 

 

 

Student Declaration:

        I certify that the work submitted for this assessment pack is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources used in my submission. I understand that a false declaration is a form of malpractice;

        I have kept a copy of this assessment pack and all relevant notes, attachments, and reference material that I used in the production of the assessment pack;

        For the purposes of assessment, I give the trainer/assessor of this assessment the permission to:

o   Reproduce this assessment and provide a copy to another member of staff; and

o   Take steps to authenticate the assessment, including communicating a copy of this assessment to a checking service (which may retain a copy of the assessment on its database for future plagiarism checking).

 

Student signature:   ________________________________              Date:  ____/_____/______________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK

 


 

ASSESSMENT DETAILS AND RESULTS SHEET

 

Purpose:

This sheet enables assessors to determine a student’s competency for each unit based on all assessment tasks submitted.  It also provides evidence to ACS that the student has been assessed appropriately, after the student’s assessment is destroyed after the mandatory 6 months retention period.  Under the Public Records Act, this sheet must be retained for 7 years.

Instructions:

Assessor: Record the outcome of each assessment task on this sheet.  Once all assessments have been finalised, determine the student’s competency for the unit based on all assessment tasks. Record the unit outcome below, sign and date then forward this form together with all assessment to the Training Manager according to the assessment submission schedule. Please refer to assessment overview for more information.

Administration Team: Record the Unit Outcome in the student management system (SMS). Ensure the date assessed matches the end date for the unit in SMS. Scan this sheet in the student’s electronic record, then save the assessment bundle in the student’s file.

Unit Name:

Interview Preparation

Sufficient evidence recorded/Outcome

S – Satisfactory
NS – Not Satisfactory

Evidence recorded

Unit Assessment Task 1

□ S / □ NS (First Attempt)

□ S / □ NS (Second Attempt)

Unit Outcome

Competent

Result not available

FINAL UNIT OUTCOME

Competent

Not Yet Competent

Comments

 

Assessor’s Name (Print)

 

 

Assessor Signature

 

 

Date Assessed

 

 

DATA ENTRY

(Entered onto TEAMS)

Competent (change result to Competent and enter date assessed)

Result not available (do not change result, record submission in notes field)


Date:                    Initials:

Competent (change result to Competent and enter date assessed)

Not Yet Competent (change result to NYC and enter date assessed)


Date:                       Initials:


Assessment Overview


Unit Description and Application

The purpose of this unit is to ensure that the participants are prepared for job seeking. The Professional Year (PYear) participants will focus on career development activities, including Interview Preparation.

 

Pre- Requisites

Not applicable

 

Co- Requisites

Not applicable

 

Relevant Legislation

  • Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986
  • Age Discrimination Act 2004
  • Disability Discrimination Act 1992
  • Racial Discrimination Act 1975
  • Sex Discrimination Act 1984
  • The Privacy Act 1988 (Privacy Act) and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)
  • Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 – Applicable in Victoria
  • Work Health and Safety Act 2011

 

Key competencies

Subject Specific

  • Develop techniques for interview preparation, including stages of interview
  • Understand questions and respond to unexpected questions
  • Structure answers appropriately Culture and Communication

Culture and Communication

  • Dress and groom appropriately for interview
  • Use positive body language
  • Apply communication strategies to seek clarification
  • Make self-understood to listener

Language

  • Small talk for establishing rapport at the beginning of an interview
  • Positive language for describing skills and abilities

 

Assessment Submission Guidelines

·         All assessments must be submitted by the due date specified by the Trainer/Assessor on the WLI Learning Management System (Moodle). To log in to WLI Moodle visit https://WLI.learnbook.com.au/login/learnbooklogin.php.

·         When submitting assessments students agree that it is their own work, except where acknowledged, and has not been submitted for academic credit elsewhere.

 

If you miss an Assessment Deadline:
If you miss a scheduled assessment you are required to provide proof of legitimate absence within three (3) working days after the official due date.

·         Proof must be provided to the Student Services Department and may be required to complete an assessment extension application form.

·         If the proof is not provided within the time period, then the student will receive a ‘Not Yet Competent (NYC)’ outcome.

·         No supplementary assessments will be scheduled without proof of legitimate absence.

·         If the proof of legitimate absence is rejected, the student can appeal to the Academic department.

·         For more information, please refer to the student handbook. 

 

Re-submission

Students are permitted 2 attempts for each assessment task.  If you are deemed Not Yet Competent (NYC) for the unit, you must re-enrol and pay the required tuition fees for the unit.

 

Assessment Task and Unit Outcome

All individual assessment tasks are marked as either Satisfactory (S) or Not Satisfactory (NS). 
Once all individual assessment tasks are marked Satisfactory (S) for a unit, the student can be deemed Competent (C).

If the student does not achieve Satisfactory (S) results for all individual assessment tasks for a unit, they will be deemed Not Yet Competent (NYC).

 

Reasonable Adjustment

At the Trainer/Assessors discretion reasonable adjustment, also known as reasonable accommodation, may be applied. This means that 'reasonable' adjustments may be made wherever possible; to meet the needs of a student with disability or with other learning needs.  If you require more details about reasonable adjustment, please refer to the student handbook.

 

Learning support

If you require further assistance in your learning, WLI encourages you to reach out to your Trainer to discuss the areas that you believe you need further assistance with. If you require further support after consulting your trainer, please see a Student Services Officer who can arrange a time to discuss your concerns with the Academic department.

 

Plagiarism Policy

All student work must be written in their own words, except where acknowledged through quotations and referencing. Plagiarism is a serious offence; The William light Institute may impose severe penalties on students who plagiarise.

For more information on Plagiarism and Cheating, visit WLI’s policy and procedures on the website. http://www.wli.edu.au/.

 

Appeals

If you are not satisfied with the decision made by a member of WLI staff, you can appeal that decision. For more information on Complaints and Appeals please see the Appeals policy and procedures on the WLI website. http://www.wli.edu.au/.

Course Credits

If you have been deemed competent in this unit as part of a prior qualification, you may eligible for credit transfer. For more information on course credits please see the Course Credits policy and procedures on the WLI website.  http://www.wli.edu.au/.

 

RPL

If you believe you have sufficient experience and knowledge in this area of study, you may be eligible for Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL). For more information on applying for RPL please see the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) policy and procedure on the WLI website.  http://www.wli.edu.au/.

 

Feedback to student

Feedback on students’ assessment performance is a vital element in their learning. Its purpose is to justify to students how their competency was assessed, as well as to identify and reward specific qualities in their work, to recommend aspects needing improvement, and to guide students on what steps to take.

 

Feedback defines for students what their trainer/assessor thinks is important for a topic or a subject. At its best, feedback should:

           Be provided for each Unit Assessment Task (UAT)

           Guide students to adapt and adjust their learning strategies

           Guide trainers/assessors to adapt and adjust teaching to accommodate students’ learning needs

           Be a pivotal feature of learning and assessment design, not an add-on ritual

           Focus on course and unit learning outcomes

           Guide students to become independent and self-reflective learners and their own critics

           Acknowledge the developmental nature of learning

 

If students have not received proper feedback, they must speak to PYP department/administration department in the WLI/person responsible for looking after the PYP department/administration of the WLI.

 

For more information, please refer to the WLI Student Handbook.


 

Question 1:

Task 1: Assessment 1 - Role Play: Job Interview

 

In a group of 2 panel members you need to act like an interviewee.

Based on the job that you chose to apply in EAW4, you need to participate in the mock interview. Panel members need to observe you based on the criteria listed in appendix 1. Collect the criteria checklists from the panel members at the end and attached with the assessment.

Checklists are attached

YES

NO

 

 

Third party/Facilitator’s comments:

Signature:

Observation’s date:





 

 


Performance criteria checked by the facilitator

Student name:

Facilitator name:

 

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

COMPETENT

NOT YET COMPETENT

Develop techniques for interview preparation, including stages of interview

 

 

Dress and groom appropriately for interview

 

 

Use positive body language

 

 

Understand questions and respond to unexpected questions

 

 

Apply communication strategies to seek clarification

 

 

Structure answers appropriately

 

 

Make self-understood to listener

 

 

Facilitator’s Signature:

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 


Assessment 1: Appendix: 1: An interview role-play checklist for panel members

 

Print two checklist for both the panel members.

 

Assessment criteria

Explanation of the criteria

Panel member’s comments

Physical Presence

·         Arrives on time and dresses appropriately

·         Confident, positive body language

·         Maintains good eye contact and posture

 

Attitude

·         Introduces self and creates a good first impression (e.g. firm handshake, smile)

·         Engages in small talk

·         Describes self in positive terms and seems motivated to work

·         Had prepared well for the interview (shows knowledge of company)

 

Voice

·         Speaks in an audible voice/not too loud

·         Enthusiasm noted in voice (varied intonation)

·         Pronunciation clear

·         Appropriate pace, which aids intelligibility

 

Answers

·         Responds concisely, but adequately to questions

·         Seeks clarification when necessary

·         Relates work skills and abilities to position

·         Gives relevant specific examples in answers

·         Structures answers well (uses STAR)

·         Uses appropriate language (not too informal, but not overly formal or wordy, and sounds like spoken English, not something written and memorised)

 

Closing the Interview

·         Asks questions relevant to the job

·         Asks about the next step in the process (if not informed by interviewer)

·         Thanks interviewer at the end

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

ITC506 - Topics in Information Technology Ethics - Assessment item 3

  Table of Contents Task 1: Argument Visualization . 3 Task 2 . 3 Introduction . 3 Utilitarianism Theory . 4 Deontology...